CALIFORNIA
click here for Nevada site

Articles

return to main articles page

 

 

Military Personnel Protections: Limitations Upon

Association Lawsuits and Assessment Lien Foreclosure 

By Bradley J. Epstein, Angius & Terry LLP 

 

            Federal and State law protect homeowners in the military by prohibiting associations from obtaining court default judgments or from foreclosing upon assessment liens against  active servicemembers.  The purpose of the Federal law, known as the Servicemembers' Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. § 501, et seq.), and the State law (Cal. Mil. & Vet. Code § 400, et seq.) is to strengthen and expedite the United States’ national defense by giving homeowners in the military certain protections in lawsuits and with respect to home foreclosures.  In particular, by providing for the temporary suspension of lawsuits and foreclosures , these laws enable homeowners in the military to focus their energy on the defense of the United States.   Further, consistent with this purpose, these laws provide for severe penalties against associations who violate these prohibitions. 

 Associations are prohibited from obtaining court default judgments against active servicemembers

             A court default judgment is a judgment that a plaintiff receives when the defendant fails to appear in the lawsuit after the defendant has received sufficient notice of the lawsuit.  Whenever an association is taking steps to obtain a default judgment against a homeowner for his failure to appear in a lawsuit, the association must file a declaration with the court, under penalty of perjury, stating whether the homeowner is in the military, or that the association was unable to determine whether the homeowner is in the military.  Homeowners are considered to be active servicemembers if they are on full time active duty.  However, it is not necessary that they be deployed in a war zone. 

            If the association indicates in the court declaration that the homeowner is in the military, then the court may not enter judgment against the homeowner until after the court appoints an attorney to represent  them.  If the association indicates that it does not know whether the homeowner is in the military,  the court may require the association to file a monetary bond with the court in order to obtain judgment.  The bond would be used to reimburse the homeowner against any resulting monetary loss if the judgment is later set aside.

            In many instances, it is impossible for an association to be certain whether a homeowner is in the military, regardless of how much investigation it performs.  Accordingly,  even if an association is fairly certain that the homeowner is not in the military, it may be prudent to indicate that the association is "informed and believes" that the homeowner is not in the military.  

            Also, if a homeowner in the military appears in the lawsuit, then she may request  a temporary suspension of the lawsuit.  The court will grant the homeowner’s request to suspend the lawsuit if it is proven that the homeowner’s current military duties affect her ability to defend herself in the lawsuit and that her military superiors will not authorize military leave.

            Further, the courts may suspend an association’s execution of a judgment against a homeowner in the military, including suspending an attachment or garnishment of the homeowner’s property or assets, if the court determines that the homeowner’s ability to comply with the judgment is materially affected by her military service.  The court may also order the homeowner to make installment payments to the association to satisfy the judgment.

Associations are prohibited from foreclosing on assessment liens against homeowners in the military where the homeowner had purchased her home before her military service commenced. 

             State law and CC&Rs authorize associations to foreclose on liens for most assessments.  However, associations may not foreclose upon assessment liens against a homeowner in the military (or within nine months after her military service ends), where the homeowner had purchased her home before her military service commenced.  The only exceptions to this prohibition are upon a court’s order for foreclosure or upon the homeowner’s agreement that the home may be foreclosed.  It is noteworthy that associations are not prohibited from foreclosing upon a lien against a homeowner in the military who had purchased her home after her military service had commenced.   

Associations who violate these prohibitions may be subject to severe penalties

             Associations and their representatives (such as board members and managers) who knowingly violate these protections  for homeowners in the military can potentially  face criminal prosecution.  Further, such violations can potentially result in association fines up to $200,000, and association representative fines up to $100,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.  Finally, if a homeowner in the military prevails in a lawsuit against an association for filing a false declaration about whether the homeowner is in the military, then the association  could also be liable for the homeowner’s attorney’s fees incurred in the lawsuit and for punitive damages.  Consequently, the association and association representatives should exercise great care prior to proceeding with default judgments or foreclosure actions against association members who are, or could potentially be, in the military.

Reprinted with permission from California Association of Community Managers, Inc. (CACM) Law Journal (Copyright, 2011, CACM)”

The information contained in this website is provided for information, educational and advertising purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any specific questions regarding construction defect law, this firm strongly recommends that you consult an attorney of your choosing.
© 2006 Angius & Terry